The Public Programs department at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum hosts events throughout the country in partner institutions on every coast. Although the Public Programs team travels to each location to ensure the careful execution of the presented program, my status as an co-op student does not grant me travel responsibility. This past Wednesday's event, however, was located in Pikesville, MD, a twenty minute drive from my house, the perfect opportunity to attend my first off-site event.
The program involved a panel discussion with two USHMM historians and Dina Gold, the author of Stolen Legacy: Nazi Theft and the Quest for Justice at Krausenstrasse 17/18 Berlin. The novel, which is set to release in a revised paperback version this coming November, follows the story of Author, Gold's, journey to reclaim the property taken from her Jewish ancestors following the expulsion of the family to England. Gold's decade long discoveries resulted in restitution for her family in the form of monetary compensation, memorial plague in front of the Berlin building, and a stolperstein, or "stumbling stone," for her great-uncle who passed away during the Holocaust.
Dina's story is a rare example of a successful reparation application. Her novel sheds light on the importance of perseverance, as learning about one's ancestry can provide necessary explanations to one's existence in the present. Following the end of World War II and the discovery of the true extent of war crimes committed by the Nazis and partnered powers, pressure existed to force guilty nations to pay victims back for the lives lost. Germany, for obvious reasons, became a symbol of reparation due to the focus placed by Allied powers. War crimes in countries such as Austria, however, were largely ignored. In fact, the procession of reparations for Austrian Holocaust victims until 2003.
Allied powers and guilty countries may be blamed for this lack of action, but this can be explained in part due to the looming question of what constitutes an "appropriate" reparation. How much monetary compensation is equivalent to the loss of a loved one, whole families and entire cultures? These are questions that cannot be simply explained by a restitution institution.
An important part of creating a "successful" application involves obtaining a certificate proving the need for reparations. In Dina Gold's case, this came in the form of a document listing her great-grandparents as the previous owner of the estate in Berlin. For reparations associated with death, a death certificate is needed to prove that the person was, at one point, a live member of society and is now deceased. With the enactment of the Final Solution and the mass extermination of European Jewry, family members of the deceased were no longer notified with official death certificates from the Third Reich. The number of deaths grew too exponentially, and, frequently, there no longer existed surviving family members outside of the concentration camp to whom a certificate could be mailed. The result has been countless rejected applications for reparations as the death certificates of those claimed to have been murdered during the Holocaust are very slim.
The topic of reparations and restitution, no matter the form is of interest to many that study the decades following World War II and the Holocaust. The news of the genocide spread around the globe quicker and farther than any other genocide, increasing interest in pursuit of compensation for all victims. Unfortunately, few have successfully sought and received reparations. Dina Gold's story is a rarity, but her overwhelming pull towards uncovering her family history, showcases the need, particularly with the fading of the World War II generation, of learning about one's ancestry.